Copyright © 1996
Association for the Study of Higher Education .
All rights reserved. This work may be used, with this header included, for
noncommercial
purposes within a
subscribed
institution.
No copies of this work may be distributed electronically outside of the
subscribed institution, in whole or in part, without express written
permission
from the
JHU Press. This
revolutionary publishing model depends
on mutual
trust between user and
publisher.
Faculty Attitudes Toward Regulating Speech on College CampusesEric L. Dey and Sylvia Hurtado
Table
4
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Political
View1
Departmental Context2 |
Racist/sexist speech should be prohibited | Officials may ban extreme speakers |
| Conservative faculty in | ||
| Conservative departments | 58 | 44 |
| Centrist departments | 53 | 44 |
| Liberal departments | 44 | 39 |
| Middle-of-the-road faculty in | ||
| Conservative departments | 59 | 32 |
| Centrist departments | 55 | 39 |
| Liberal departments | 54 | 27 |
| Liberal faculty in | ||
| Conservative departments | 55 | 20 |
| Centrist departments | 54 | 17 |
| Liberal departments | 50 | 14 |
1Collapsed from a 5-point scale: Conservative = "far right" and "conservative," Liberal = "far left" and "liberal."
2Determined following procedures used in Ladd & Lipset (1975) and Hamilton & Hargens (1993).
Return to Text
Tables: Faculty Attitudes Toward Regulating Speech on College Campuses
[ Table 1] [ Table 2] [ Table 3] [Table 4] [ Table 5] [ Table 6]